As an Amazon Associate we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page.
The fastest way to decide which kids’ board games to keep is to hand the job to the kids and have them sort every box into four piles — get rid of, not sure, want to play soon, and love — and then give the survivors a place where they can actually be seen. The sorting is the easy half. The half that decides whether any of it mattered is what happens to the keepers afterward, because a game that gets tidied into a closed container stops getting played, and in a year you will be sorting the same shelf again.
We ran this on a Saturday afternoon, with two boys and a shelf we had let get well out of hand. What follows is the procedure exactly as we ran it, the one rule that kept the brothers from fighting, and the principle underneath the whole thing — which is the part we are least finished thinking about.
The four piles, and why the kids make every call
Four piles. The kids decide which box goes in which pile, and an adult does not overrule them.
- Get rid of. Gone. Sold, donated, handed to a cousin.
- Not sure. A real pile, not a holding pen for cowardice. Some things genuinely are unresolved.
- Want to play soon. The important one, and the one most decluttering advice does not have. A game is allowed in here that they have never played.
- Love. Not getting rid of it. No justification required.
The third pile is what makes this different from a cull. A straight declutter asks one question — keep or toss — and every unplayed box fails it, including the good ones you bought slightly too early. Splitting “keep” into “love” and “want to play soon” gives a child somewhere to put a game they are curious about but cannot yet defend, and it turns the sort into a to-do list instead of only a purge.
Letting them decide is not sentimentality, it is accuracy, and you should expect it to cost you something. Hungry Hungry Hippos is the example in our house. We would happily never hunt another of those balls out from under the sofa again — and it is not our call, because the kids get the vote. That is the deal. Adults are unreliable judges of which games a child will keep choosing, which is worth remembering when you read anybody’s list of the best board games for kids, ours included.
The fifth category is not a pile. It is a place.
Partway through we needed a category the piles could not express: games you can play with your grandparents. Those do not go into a pile, they go to a spot on the shelf, together, so that when Nana and Pop Pop walk in the kids run down and grab something everybody already knows how to play. No teach, no rulebook, no fifteen minutes of setup while the visit burns down.
Ours ended up being Sequence for Kids, Picture Charades, Spot It, Penny Drop, National Parks Memory, Pizza Party, Super Mega Lucky Box, Skyjo, Trio, Denuko, Kabunga and Rebel Princess. The common thread is not simplicity — several of those have real decisions in them — it is that nobody has to be taught. Rebel Princess earns its place for the opposite reason: it is a trick-taking game that levels the floor, so it is fun for someone who has not been playing hearts for sixty years.
Sequence for Kids is the clearest example of the type. The box is printed for 2–4 players, ages 3 and up, and the publisher’s own selling point is that reading is not required: you play an animal card, you put your chip on the matching animal, four in a row wins. A grandparent can sit down mid-conversation and be playing inside a minute.
Then each kid picks five loves and five want-to-plays
This is the step that converts a tidy shelf into a played shelf. Each child picks five games from their love pile and five from want-to-play-soon. Those ten go on top of the unit, standing up, bookshelf-style, facing out.
The top of that unit used to be the surface we tried to keep clear, and it was a total disaster — the flat place where library books and hair ties and half a Lego set accumulate. Putting the ten favorites there solved two problems with one move: the clutter has nowhere to land, and the ten games a child has just told you they care about are now the most visible objects in the room.
One of our boys picked Ice Cool, Slapzi, a Harry Potter game, Wandering Towers and Herd Mentality as his five loves, and put Magical Athlete, MicroMacro, a baseball card game, Hungry Monkey, Throw Throw Burrito and My Weird School in his want-to-play five. Half of that list is not, by any normal definition, a children’s game. We will come back to that.
The sibling rule: you can promote, you can never demote
Two kids sorting one shared shelf is where this method lives or dies. The rule we landed on is one line long and it held for the entire afternoon:
The second child may promote a game into a higher pile. They may never demote one their brother placed higher.
So the first pass sets a floor and the second pass can only raise it. Nobody’s favorite can be thrown out by a sibling, which removes the single thing that turns a sort into a fight, and the shared shelf ends up reflecting the union of what the two of them care about rather than the intersection.
There is a useful escape valve, too. One of ours volunteered that he did not care what happened to his own not sure pile — which handed his brother real authority over a genuine chunk of the shelf, and made the younger one take the job seriously.
Why visibility is the whole mechanic
Here is the thing we kept arriving at, four separate times, without meaning to: if you store games in a clever container, you lose visibility into them, and games you cannot see do not get played. Out of sight, out of mind. It is not a storage preference. It is the mechanism by which good games die in a house that owns a lot of them.
The clearest casualty is the one the hobby recommends most often: the photo box. You pull a small-box game out of its oversized cardboard, drop the cards and bits into a 4×6 photo case, and the shelf gets dramatically tidier. It is a genuinely great object — easy to transport, right size, stacks beautifully. And then nobody ever thinks about Rhino Hero again. We own several. They work exactly as advertised and they are where games go to be forgotten.
Clear bags do not rescue it either. Even when you can technically see through the bag, a child cannot see the game — the art, the logo, the thing that made them want it in the first place — so they will never pick it. Most of the board game storage ideas we have written about are solving the wrong problem beautifully: they optimize for shelf space when the binding constraint is attention.
And we have not solved this. That is the honest end of the paragraph. We have pursued a couple of different answers and none of them squares the circle: small boxes waste shelf space, and the solutions that fix the waste also make the game invisible. If you are shopping for a board game organizer, buy one knowing that the ones which hide their contents will quietly cost you plays.
What counts as a kids’ game keeps changing — and it is not about age
The most useful thing the sort surfaced was not which games left the house. It was how many games moved down to the kids’ shelf. Super Mega Lucky Box, Herd Mentality, Kabunga, Skyjo, Trio, Denuko, Blokus, Wandering Towers, Hey That’s My Fish, Spots, Qwirkle, Odin. None of those were bought as children’s games. Herd Mentality is an adult party game and it is currently one of our boys’ favorite game in the house.
The axis that actually matters is not the number printed on the box. It is whether a child can run the game without you — deal it, explain it, adjudicate it, finish it. That is a capability, it arrives at a different moment for every kid and every game, and it is invisible to the age rating. It is also why we hold some games back that the kids genuinely like: Tapple stays up high because they will not start it on their own, which tells you something the box does not.
If you have been shopping by the number on the corner of the lid, our board games by age guides are a starting point and not a verdict. The test is the one you can run at your own table this week.
Quacks is the proof. CMYK prints it for 2–4 players, 45 minutes, ages 10+, and we cannot say enough good things about it as a game to grow up with. The reason is structural: the difficulty and complexity levers all live in the box. You can hand a younger player a simpler ingredient set and a beginner board, and the game is still the real game rather than a diluted version of it. It also does something we did not buy it for — you are drawing blind out of a bag, in front of your siblings, so it turns out to be a very effective place to talk about being honest, not peeking, and losing gracefully.
One buying note, because the shelf is confusing right now: the game sold for years as The Quacks of Quedlinburg is now published by CMYK simply as Quacks, and the publisher describes the standard edition as everything from the classic game with updated art at a lower price. Deluxe and All-In editions add upgraded tiles and bags, and the All-In adds The Witches and The Alchemists expansions. The standard box is the one to start with.
What survived our sort, and what did not
Three boxes are worth walking through, because they landed in three different piles for three different reasons and between them they cover most of what you will hit.
Love: Outfoxed!
The perfect kids’ game, and the one we would hand to a family that owns nothing. Gamewright prints it for 2–4 players, ages 5 and up, about 20 minutes. It is cooperative, so there is no losing child at the end of it, and the deduction is genuine — you move around the board gathering clues, run suspects through a physical decoder, and rule foxes out until you can name the thief before it escapes. Children take it seriously in a way they do not take roll-and-move seriously.
Our honest regret with it is a scheduling one rather than a design one: we played it constantly with the older boy and have barely played it with the younger, purely because it arrived during a different era of the household. It came out of the sort flagged as one to bring back. If you want more in this shape, it sits with our picks for cooperative board games for kids.
Want to play soon: Dragonwood
Dragonwood is the pile-three archetype: a game we know is good, that one child has played a lot and the other has not played at all. Gamewright prints it for 2–4 players, ages 8 and up, about 20 minutes. You collect sets of adventurer cards to earn dice, then roll those dice against goblins and ogres and the orange dragon. There are real decisions — press now with four dice or wait and build to six — and because you are all fighting the same creatures it has the feel of a team effort without actually being cooperative.
That is exactly the box the “want to play soon” pile exists to catch. Under a keep-or-toss rule it would have looked like dead weight on the shelf. Under this one it is now a specific plan for a specific Tuesday.
Done its job: Sleeping Queens 2
We are not going to sell you this one, and the reason is worth more than a recommendation would be. Sleeping Queens 2 did precisely the job we bought it for: a comfortable, familiar setting at the right difficulty, introducing more complex mechanics than the original. It is a real bridge game and it worked.
And having crossed it, what it now feels like at our table is a fiddly mess — lots of small rules interactions in service of a game whose job is done. It is not a bad box. It is a box we have finished with, and the right move is to move on to better games rather than keep it out of loyalty. If your child is at the step below it, it will work for you too, and then you should expect the same thing to happen.
What to do with the get-rid-of pile
Do not let it sit in the hallway for six weeks, because a pile that lingers gets re-litigated and half of it comes back. Sort it once, the same day, into three destinations: things with resale value, things a specific family you know will actually use, and things that are genuinely worn out.
Kids’ games in good condition hold value better than people expect, particularly complete legacy boxes and anything out of print — our guide to selling used board games covers where each of those goes and what to expect. The ones with missing pieces are not a donation, they are a landfill problem you are handing to a thrift store; be honest about which pile a box is in.
The travel bag you get for free
One by-product worth planning for. While you are handling every box anyway, pull out everything that can be taught and played in ten to fifteen minutes — the Slapzi and Slamwich class of game — and bag them separately. That bag lives in the car or the backpack.
Ours exists because of ballet: there is a lot of green-room downtime during Nutcracker season, and a ten-minute game is the difference between a tolerable evening and an iPad. You will find the same pocket of time somewhere — waiting rooms, restaurants, the hour before a flight. Our travel games for kids list is built around the same fifteen-minute test.
And when the shelf is sorted, the piles are gone and the top row is facing out, the next question is what to put in the gaps. That is what our best family board games guide is for — it is the list we would rebuild a family shelf from.
Rebuilding the shelf after a sort?
Get our free Top 10 Must-Have Games guide — ten games with the honest case for each, including who should skip them. No hype, no spam, just games worth the evening.
Frequently asked questions
How do you decide which kids’ board games to keep?
Decide which kids’ board games to keep by having the children sort every box into four piles: get rid of, not sure, want to play soon, and love. The kids make the calls and adults do not overrule them. Then give the survivors visible storage, because the sorting only matters if the games that stay can actually be seen and chosen.
Should you let your kids decide which board games to get rid of?
Yes, let your kids decide which board games to get rid of, because adults are unreliable at predicting which games a child will keep choosing. With siblings, add one rule: a second child may promote a game into a higher pile but may never demote one their brother or sister placed higher. That single rule prevents nearly every argument.
What is the best way to store kids’ board games so they actually get played?
The best way to store kids’ board games is face-out and at their eye level, with each child’s current favorites in the most prominent spot. We put five loved games and five they want to play soon on top of the shelving unit, standing up. Visibility drives play far more than shelf efficiency does.
Are photo boxes good for storing small board games?
Photo boxes are excellent objects and a poor storage strategy for games you want played. Moving a small-box game into a 4×6 photo case saves real shelf space, but the box art disappears and nobody remembers the game exists. Clear bags do not fix it either, because a child still cannot see the game itself and so never picks it.
At what age can a child play a board game on their own?
There is no single age, and the age printed on the box is the wrong test. The useful question is whether a child can run the game unaided: deal it, teach it, settle disputes and finish it. That capability arrives at different moments for different games, which is why adult party games like Herd Mentality often move to the kids’ shelf earlier than children’s games do.